commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
I Shot Andy Warhol


The Andy Warhol season continued in my apartment last night, where I Shot Andy Warhol was screened. The audience consisted of one person, who happened to live in the apartment and had seen the film before. Although there was no sign of The Velvet Underground or Nico, proceedings were livened up by Stephen Dorff playing Candy Darling and a nostalgic 90s-style soundtrack put together by John Cale.

Despite Valerie Solanas hating Warhol and almost killing him, they were more alike than they realized. Both of them were obsessive types who didn't deviate from what they aspired; both exploited the people around them either to survive (Valerie's case) or to get what they wanted (Warhol's case). Is there someone equivalent to Warhol alive today? Is there a Factory in London, where you can wander in and immediately become part of art history?

Everyone alive and vibrant in the 60s was dead or irrelevant by the end of the 80s.

The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can't relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings -- hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt -- and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn't.

From Valerie Solanas' S.C.U.M. manifesto
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
Dexter


The FBI believes 85% of the world's serial killers are in the U.S.A., and that 20 to 50 of them are active at any given time. I wonder if any of them watch Dexter, and if they enjoy the show. Do they feel a unique connection with Dexter? Do they have pre-orders with Amazon for the series' boxset as soon as it's available?

I didn't think much of the show when I watched it with [livejournal.com profile] desayuno_ingles in Brasil. We watched the sixth episode and, despite most of the plot being explained to me, I still found the show convoluted, badly acted and somewhat hackneyed. When I returned to London, I learned that Kevin and Sissy Jen had gone through a Dexter marathon, thanks to the episodes being available for free, on demand. I decided to give the show a second chance, from its start, seeing that I was unemployed and had nothing better to do all day.

Dexter comes close to being great TV. It's not quite there yet for me, but it's almost there (I'm currenly on episode 8 of the first season). The premise is brilliant: Dexter is a blood splatter specialist with the Miami police who also happens to be a closeted serial killer. However, Dexter was raised by a foster father with Nietzschean ideals, who believed his son's psychopathy could be used as a force for good, i.e. he trains Dexter to direct his bloodlust at bad people. From there, the show constantly pits Dexter against notions of good and evil in modern life. If you are a nurse who poisons patients, you deserve to die in his hands. But if you killed a boy who raped you, then it's OK to retaliate; Dexter will let you get away with murder because you fit his view of what is acceptable.

The supporting actors are the main reason why this show isn't excellent. From Dexter's stilted cop sister, to the horribly miscast Lt. Maria Laguerta, the characters vary between downright bad acting to passable work. The show would benefit from new characters being introduced after an explosion that wipes out most of the old ones. However, the bad acting could be due to first-episodes-shakiness; I'm hoping they'll get better as the show grows. Right now, Michael C. Hall plays Dexter to perfection. He's all-American charm as well as enigmatic and camp. References to the novel American Psycho, as well as a host of other serial killers in pop culture, don't go amiss. You feel for Dexter when he finally gets his chance to confess to someone that he's a serial killer. And you can't help worrying for his relationship with the perenially fucked up single mother Rita as their relationship grows. To go from being a traumatised victim of domestic violence to lover of a serial killer has got to hurt!

My biggest worry right now is that the free episodes will end soon (it was a month-long promotion for FX channel) and I will have to wait until the boxset is available. I'd rather face Dexter's chopping board then wait a whole year for my fix to be satisfied.
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
Speaker's Corner


Yesterday, I took Bruno to Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park and he promptly fell in love with it. He loves anything that has to do with controversy and argumentative people. He took many photos of determined faces blaming the wrongs of the world on Christianity, Islam, Capitalism, Socialism, and what-have-you.

The old man in this photo had two buttons pinned to his jacket, which read "Don't Panic" and "Back to the 70s". His belt buckle had a Marijuana leaf design. He went from one speaker to the next, grinning silently as if he was incapable of taking anyone seriously.

The guy to the right in the photo would say to nobody in particular: "how many of you are feeling bad right now? Aren't we all feeling good? It's a miracle." He spent a good amount of time talking to uninterested passerbys.

Most of the crowd consisted of Muslim men. Interestingly, while the Christian speaker proclaimed a lot of evils had to do with Islam (while angry young Muslims screamed back at him), the Muslim speakers emphasided how Islam was not about terrorism, the oppression of women or any of the other evils pushed forward by the right-wing press (though I can't put my hand in the fire for one of the men speaking heatedly in an Arabic-sounding language.) The most interesting speaker, by a wide margin, was the articulate socialist who wanted to prove Hugo Chavez's government was doing great things to Venezuela.

Some families appear to rent lawn chairs at Hyde Park and sit all day facing Speakers' Corner. I wonder if they were related to the speakers and the men in the crowd who treat the place as their Sunday routine.
commonpeople1: (Daily Mail Reader)
One Step Behind, by Henning Mankell

Henning Mankell, One Step Behind, 2003
This was one of the three novels I bought at Heathrow Airport with my goodbye book vouchers (the other two being Robert Harris' Imperium and Roger Zelazny´s Lord of Light). It's a tightly written crime novel that doesn't leave any stones unturned or plot holes unplugged. It's the seventh novel in a series featuring the Swedish detective Kurt Wallader who, amidst a struggle with his diabetes and an arrogant attorney, has to find the worst serial killer in Sweden's history. Swedish criminal procedure is minutely described and the tension builds nicely until the satisfying conclusion. However, the strongest impression to stay with the reader once the novel is finished is the deep melancholia that envelops the Swedish and rules their lives. A perfect read if you are stuck in a farm in the middle of nowhere, with incessant rain keeping you indoors.

Thank you [livejournal.com profile] hyong_jin for the recommendation. :-)
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib

Seymour M. Hersh, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, 2004 (with 2005 afterword)
You don't have to be a genius, or even up on current news, to know that America fucked up in Iraq. To learn the intricacies of America's mistakes, however -- the sheer lack of competence and vision -- is enough to fry anyone's braincells and leave them cowering in the corner like a psychiatric ward patient. Hersh, a Pulitzer-prize winnining journalist, exposes the turmoil many countries have been thrust into since 9/11 and how directly it is related to the Neo-cons close to Bush. The picture that emerges is a horrifying one: instability has grown in the Middle East since 9/11; nobody with power seems to have a vision; thousands of innocents are being killed and tortured, with no end in sight; and the American public continues to be lied and patronised by a small enclave of powerful men and women who absolutely don't hold their best interests to heart.

My question after reading this book was: why has nobody stormed the White House yet and overthrown Bush? Similarly, why are the British so apathetic to Blair? Is it because we are democracies and we will punish them next time an election comes around (like the recent Senate/Congress elections in America?)

And this book's scariest news: Pakistan has been selling nuclear weapon know-how across the Islamic world and we are ever closer to the point when extremists will have a warhead in their hands. It may be time for Kevin and I to get extra serious about moving away from London...

"There are many who believe George Bush is a liar, a President who knowingly and deliberately twists facts for political gain. But lying would indicate an understanding of what is desired, what is possible, and how best to get there. A more plausible explanation is that words have no meaning for this President beyond the immediate moment, and so he believes that his mere utterances of the phrases makes them real. It is a terrifying possibility." (p.367)
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
The Haunting


I was still a kid when I first read The Haunting of Hill House, by Shirley Jackson. It was a version translated into Brasilian Portuguese, bought in a tiny shopping mall near the apartment I grew up in São Paulo (I asked the saleswoman for a ghost story because I wanted to give Agatha Christie a break.) I loved the novel even though I wasn't old enough to fully understand it.

A few years ago, while visiting Kevin's parents in Canada, we rented The Haunting (the 1963 version) from the nearest strip mall videostore. Kevin's mom told us later that it gave her nightmares (very understandable when you consider she lives in a remote farm). I was impressed at how faithful the film was to the novel and how it built the suspense purely on suggestion and on a few key scenes involving "the haunting". Many of the novel's themes -- unstable minds meeting an unstable house; "unnatural" sexuality in an "unnatural" house -- also survive in the film, making it a kind of perfect companion piece for Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho. But, whereas Hitchcock's movie deals with dangerous human insanity in a remote location, The Haunting is about the power a place can have in destabilizing a person whose mind is weak. Hitchcock's psycho gets found out in the end while Hill House continues to stand after the characters are gone, with the implication that many more will meet a horrible fate there.

I bought the film on DVD over Christmas, when I saw it on sale, and last night we got the sour cream Pringles and chocolate biscuits ready before popping in the film. Although naive in some ways, and awkward in others (especially the interior monologues), the film still stands as one of the best ghost stories ever made. It's just so... classy. It's from a time when film-makers assumed their audience were intelligent and could come to their own conclusions, as well as tolerate plenty of dialogue between the characters. No blood and guts here.

I wish there were more ghost stories put to film, more creepy novels on the bestselling lists. Enough with all these chicklit novels and boring film franchises. Let's tell ghost stories to each other.
commonpeople1: (Jehovah Witness)
The mystery caller who likes to sing brasilian children songs has been unmasked.

Last Friday, a co-worker on maternity leave came to our office to show off her baby. While chatting, she mentioned having a brasilian friend in Brighton. After leaving our office, she must have told this friend about me (including my work phone number) because it was this person who called and left the creepy message.

Co-worker on maternity leave just sent text message asking what I thought of the song.

I swear to God that's not typical brasilian behaviour.
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
An anonymous brasilian woman called my work phone on Saturday and sang a children's song to my answering machine before hanging up. I'm incredibly creeped out!

I only know one brasilian woman in London, and it wasn't her voice (plus, she would never do such a thing to me.) So I've been cracking my brain trying to figure out:

a) Who is this person and how did she find my work phone?
b) Why did she leave me such a creepy message? (though my co-workers think it's more like the silly humour of someone stoned)
c) Will she be calling again and, if my boss picks up, what will she say?

If the caller was one of you, please let me know.

The song was Amiguinha Xuxa.
commonpeople1: (Jehovah Witness)
The developing story of the Ipswich Ripper reminds me of a few British crime novels I've read in the past two years. The remote British countryside, the serial killer who strikes in a manner never seen before (this one is the fastest-acting one in Britain's history, apparently), the families of the victims thrust into the media spotlight, even the pathos of one of the prostitutes interviewed by ITV last week showing up dead yesterday. It could have come straight out of an Ian Rankin or Lynda La Plante novel.

Last night, ITV news reported "directly from Ipswich's red light district". The tone of the presenter was incredibly sensationalist, highlighting the killer's intelligence, the fear in the local population and, disturbingly in my opinion, the fact that the killer would strike again. Over on BBC, the coverage centred on the families that were not aware their daughters were prostitutes, or the profiling of the killer (white male, in his 20s or 30s, with a history of violence but possibly no criminal record).

Much is being made of the killer's audacity in dumping the bodies near ongoing investigation sites - as if he's playing a mind game with the police and enjoying the coverage. Now, with all prostitutes staying home out of fear, some journalists are predicting that the next victim will be an "average" woman caught by the killer as she makes her way to a Christmas celebration. Again, the echoes of a crime novel come through, where the plot grows from the tension between the killer's audacity and the pressures on the police to capture him.

When Kevin and I first moved to Britain, two little girls disappeared in Soham, and their bodies were later found in a remote area, half-burnt. It was fascinating for me to see how much support the public gave to the investigation as well as the speed in which the culprits were caught. I have a feeling it will be the same with this story. We'll hear of an arrest soon, then follow through the papers the presentation of evidence, the trial and sentencing.
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
"Al Qaeda militants in Iraq have vowed to wage war on the "worshippers of the cross" following the Pope's controversial comments about Islam. The group said it would "break the cross and spill the wine". Pope Benedict XVI caused anger in the Muslim world over the weekend with comments earlier in the week that seemed to endorse a view that Islam was a violent religion." - from here

I don't know if I should cry or laugh when the news begins to sound like something straight out of The Onion.
commonpeople1: (Log Lady)
The story of the girl in the cellar, who was kidnapped eight years ago in Austria, is the kind of news story which will push everything else out of the front page, and probably generate a few Hollywood movie deals too.

This story reminds me of the artist Gregor Schneider, who recently had a show in London where two identical homes were used, with identical twins, and rooms furnished to imply the imprisonming of children. I didn't go to it, but it so affected Kevin that, to this day, he still talks about it as one of the most disturbing experiences of his life.
commonpeople1: (pensando)
I need a gym buddy. I miss Megan - Goddam, why did she have to quit this place months before me? Now I train all alone, and have to keep Ginger Minger's stalking tactics and other encounters in the locker room all too myself.

I went to the gym yesterday and worked on my legs and triceps. Today, I did the second part of my "training": upper body. You are reading this and thinking "Ollie is some meathead that looks like Mr.T" I don't and I'm not. I never push myself on those machines because I'm not after big puffy muscles. I just want to be lean and mean (until Ginger Minger cries.) Still, it's hard to motivate myself to go. It would be nicer to have an ally at the gym.

After I come back from Brasil, I'll be looking for a new gym. Thus, the quest to find a new gym buddy. It could work! We can arrive together at the gym, snigger at the ladies in the aerobics classes, exchange eyes when the macho guys bend over and we can see their tatty underwear. You know, fun stuff. Fruity cocktails afterwards and friendly punches to the shoulder. Glistening sweat and budding friendship smiles.

As for this week, I'm contemplating a marathon of exercise. I'm thinking of going in tomorrow for some cardio, then back on thursday and friday for a rerun of my cycle-of-muscle-torture. Vanity begets a lovely body to face the Brasilian sun.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 09:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios