commonpeople1: (Default)
[personal profile] commonpeople1
The Little StrangerThe Little Stranger by Sarah Waters

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

What a disappointment this was. All the elements for a good ghost story are there: a decaying grand house, a cast of characters with varying damaged psyches, a perfectly described England post-World War II, and a series of paranormal events that get progressively worse. So what went wrong? I think Waters chose to stretch what could have been a great short story or novella into a novel with too much padding. With ghost stories, either you get it right or you get it wrong, there is no middle ground: the suspense has to be just right, the build up carefully leading the reader to a dénouement. Any padding on the way that makes you put down the book and do something else dispels the creepiness, unlatches the trap, blows away the mists.

But the novel isn't a complete failure: there's a very subtle and enjoyable nod to Shirley Jackson's "Haunt of Hill House" in the character of Caroline, a "spinster" with modern views on how a woman should lead her life; and the novel does have a great ending that brings the story full circle to its first pages. Waters is very good at bringing to period romances a touch of the unexplored, queer and even kitschy. That quality is absent here, apart from a few eggy paranormal scenes that do very little to bring the reader back into the story.

View all my reviews

Date: 2011-08-19 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naturalbornkaos.livejournal.com
I agree it's a little padded out but I really enjoyed this one. Not her best but even at her worst, I still really love her style.

Date: 2011-08-19 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com
She's undeniably a good writer, and the ending was perfect, but I was disappointed with the middle section.

Date: 2011-08-19 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] verybadhorse.livejournal.com
aw, ollie, that sucks.

i love your book reviews, by the way.

Date: 2011-08-20 11:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com
Thank you. x

Date: 2011-08-20 01:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sallypointzero.livejournal.com
Abrupt dislocation ; unsettling disjointedness -- quo vadis, huh? :-(

Date: 2011-08-20 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com
Fictio cedit veritati.

Date: 2011-08-20 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leicesterstreet.livejournal.com
Hi, I found you through a comment you added to Richie73's lj. I've added you to my friends list :-). Not entirely sure why I did, I just felt compelled to.

Although the fact that you read is something I don't encounter often in people these days.

Date: 2011-08-20 01:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com
Hello there! I've added you back. :-)

Date: 2011-08-20 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] petercampbell.livejournal.com
That one's sitting in my "books to be read" pile - perhaps I won't bother now...

Date: 2011-08-20 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commonpeople.livejournal.com
Well, some people really liked it (including Booker panelists!) Maybe you'll see something in it I missed? I'd say give it the first 100 pages and then make up your mind.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 04:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios