Too Little Frights
Aug. 19th, 2011 09:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

My rating: 2 of 5 stars
What a disappointment this was. All the elements for a good ghost story are there: a decaying grand house, a cast of characters with varying damaged psyches, a perfectly described England post-World War II, and a series of paranormal events that get progressively worse. So what went wrong? I think Waters chose to stretch what could have been a great short story or novella into a novel with too much padding. With ghost stories, either you get it right or you get it wrong, there is no middle ground: the suspense has to be just right, the build up carefully leading the reader to a dénouement. Any padding on the way that makes you put down the book and do something else dispels the creepiness, unlatches the trap, blows away the mists.
But the novel isn't a complete failure: there's a very subtle and enjoyable nod to Shirley Jackson's "Haunt of Hill House" in the character of Caroline, a "spinster" with modern views on how a woman should lead her life; and the novel does have a great ending that brings the story full circle to its first pages. Waters is very good at bringing to period romances a touch of the unexplored, queer and even kitschy. That quality is absent here, apart from a few eggy paranormal scenes that do very little to bring the reader back into the story.
View all my reviews
no subject
Date: 2011-08-19 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-19 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-19 09:17 pm (UTC)i love your book reviews, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 12:34 pm (UTC)Although the fact that you read is something I don't encounter often in people these days.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-20 06:09 pm (UTC)